A person typing on a laptop with an overlaid glowing blue security shield and network icons.

DORA Compliance and IGA: Strengthening Financial Resilience

Date Posted:

Category:

Security

Author:

Shantha Kumar

A person typing on a laptop with an overlaid glowing blue security shield and network icons.

DORA Compliance and IGA: Strengthening Financial Resilience

Date Posted:

Category:

Security

Author:

Shantha Kumar

A person typing on a laptop with an overlaid glowing blue security shield and network icons.

DORA Compliance and IGA: Strengthening Financial Resilience

Date Posted:

Category:

Security

Author:

Shantha Kumar

Get your Tailored Quote for your Organisation

Get your Tailored Quote for your Organisation

Get your Tailored Quote for your Organisation

Introduction

The Digital Operational Resilience Act or DORA will be fully adopted by all EU countries and their major trading partners in 2026.It will change how financial stability is achieved in the European Union and global markets. DORA is different, from regulations that mainly focused on data protection. This new regulation requires institutions to show that their technology systems can handle, respond to and recover from all kinds of disruptions. These disruptions can range from cyberattacks to system failures. Because of this change Identity Governance and Administration or IGA becomes a part of a financial institution’s infrastructure. IGA provides automated controls that help institutions withstand disruptions. It also helps them keep monitoring their compliance, DORA and IGA are important for financial institutions to manage risks and stay compliant.

The Shift from Compliance to Resilience

Under DORA Article 8 financial institutions have to show that their computer systems can deal with problems respond to them and get back to normal after something goes wrong. Now people who work on IGA projects focus on two things that help financial institutions be strong:

1. Critical Function Mapping with Risk-Based Access Controls

DORA Article 9 says that institutions have to find out which parts of their business are crucial to keeping things running. IGA platforms help with this by doing a thing:

Identity-to-Function Mapping

They automatically label accounts that have access to important systems. Like the systems that handle payments, trading and the main banking systems. This helps people see which users can affect how well the business runs.

Graduated Security Controls

They use special controls for users who have a lot of power while still following the idea that no one should be trusted completely. Users who have a lot of power get attention and only get access to what they need at the last minute.

Continuous Verification

They get rid of rules for who can access what and instead use rules that change based on how much of a risk something is. Access, to systems is always being checked to make sure it is okay based on what the user is doing the device they are using and what threats are out there. Which is what DORA says institutions should do to manage risk with their computer systems.

2. Incident Response Integration and Automated Containment

Automated Access Revocation

If someone’s identity is compromised the IGA platform can stop all access to cloud and, on-premise applications in a few seconds. Not hours. This automatic containment helps limit the damage and keeps things running smoothly.

Identity-Centric Threat Detection

The IGA platform works with Security Information and Event Management tools to look at what people doing with their identities and see if there are any security problems. If someone is accessing things in a way the system takes action right away.

Immutable Audit Trails

The IGA platform is really useful because it keeps a record of every time someone tries to access something. This is helpful, for incident reports that DORA needs. When something goes wrong the people who make the rules can look at the IGA platform to see what happened and how it was handled. The IGA platform gives them the information they need to do their job.

Governing ICT Third-Party Risk Under DORA

Article 28 of DORA sets rules, for checking on third-party service providers. These providers include cloud providers, fintech partners and consulting firms.

Vendor Access Lifecycle Management

Modern IGA platforms manage extended enterprise risk through:

Time-Bound Provisioning

Automatically give vendors access, with expiration dates that match their contract terms. When a consulting project ends or a cloud service contract runs out access is taken away automatically. This way you do not have to worry about accounts anymore.

Security Threshold Monitoring

We need to check how safe the vendors are. If a vendor does not do well on the security tests or does not follow the rules, we agreed on the IGA platforms will stop them from getting in until they fix the problems with their security. We have to keep checking the security of the vendors all the time.

Automated Attestation

We need to make sure vendors are still necessary, on a basis. Business owners have to check that they still need access so we can stop people from getting access they do not need in systems that are not our own. This will help prevent identity creep in systems that are used by third party vendors.

Fourth-Party Risk Visibility

To comply with DORA's concentration risk obligations, it is necessary to monitor and trace sub-contractors. The new IGA solutions can now map out the entire Identity ecosystem of the supply chain and can ensure that the technicians of a Cloud provider or the Sub-contractors of a Vendor will not become an unmonitored backdoor into your environment.

Conclusion: From Regulatory Burden to Competitive Advantage

DORA compliance is something that you have to keep working on all the time. It is not something that you do one time. Then you are done. To do these financial institutions can make a plan to deal with problems. This plan can help them use automated Identity Governance and Administration or IGA for short in the ways:

  • Reduce the time it takes to fix identity problems from hours to just seconds

  • Stop doing compliance reports by hand and use computers to check everything all the time and collect proof

  • Make it faster to add vendors while still keeping everything safe

  • Change the way they get ready for audits from a big rush every quarter to a dashboard that shows if they are complying with the rules in real time

If organizations think that DORA compliance is just something they have to do to follow the rules, they will have a hard time meeting the deadline in January 2026. If they use IGA to help them deal with problems, they will be able to move faster and be more trusted by the people they work with. DORA compliance will help these organizations be better, than their competitors. DORA is important. Organizations need to take DORA compliance seriously.


Introduction

The Digital Operational Resilience Act or DORA will be fully adopted by all EU countries and their major trading partners in 2026.It will change how financial stability is achieved in the European Union and global markets. DORA is different, from regulations that mainly focused on data protection. This new regulation requires institutions to show that their technology systems can handle, respond to and recover from all kinds of disruptions. These disruptions can range from cyberattacks to system failures. Because of this change Identity Governance and Administration or IGA becomes a part of a financial institution’s infrastructure. IGA provides automated controls that help institutions withstand disruptions. It also helps them keep monitoring their compliance, DORA and IGA are important for financial institutions to manage risks and stay compliant.

The Shift from Compliance to Resilience

Under DORA Article 8 financial institutions have to show that their computer systems can deal with problems respond to them and get back to normal after something goes wrong. Now people who work on IGA projects focus on two things that help financial institutions be strong:

1. Critical Function Mapping with Risk-Based Access Controls

DORA Article 9 says that institutions have to find out which parts of their business are crucial to keeping things running. IGA platforms help with this by doing a thing:

Identity-to-Function Mapping

They automatically label accounts that have access to important systems. Like the systems that handle payments, trading and the main banking systems. This helps people see which users can affect how well the business runs.

Graduated Security Controls

They use special controls for users who have a lot of power while still following the idea that no one should be trusted completely. Users who have a lot of power get attention and only get access to what they need at the last minute.

Continuous Verification

They get rid of rules for who can access what and instead use rules that change based on how much of a risk something is. Access, to systems is always being checked to make sure it is okay based on what the user is doing the device they are using and what threats are out there. Which is what DORA says institutions should do to manage risk with their computer systems.

2. Incident Response Integration and Automated Containment

Automated Access Revocation

If someone’s identity is compromised the IGA platform can stop all access to cloud and, on-premise applications in a few seconds. Not hours. This automatic containment helps limit the damage and keeps things running smoothly.

Identity-Centric Threat Detection

The IGA platform works with Security Information and Event Management tools to look at what people doing with their identities and see if there are any security problems. If someone is accessing things in a way the system takes action right away.

Immutable Audit Trails

The IGA platform is really useful because it keeps a record of every time someone tries to access something. This is helpful, for incident reports that DORA needs. When something goes wrong the people who make the rules can look at the IGA platform to see what happened and how it was handled. The IGA platform gives them the information they need to do their job.

Governing ICT Third-Party Risk Under DORA

Article 28 of DORA sets rules, for checking on third-party service providers. These providers include cloud providers, fintech partners and consulting firms.

Vendor Access Lifecycle Management

Modern IGA platforms manage extended enterprise risk through:

Time-Bound Provisioning

Automatically give vendors access, with expiration dates that match their contract terms. When a consulting project ends or a cloud service contract runs out access is taken away automatically. This way you do not have to worry about accounts anymore.

Security Threshold Monitoring

We need to check how safe the vendors are. If a vendor does not do well on the security tests or does not follow the rules, we agreed on the IGA platforms will stop them from getting in until they fix the problems with their security. We have to keep checking the security of the vendors all the time.

Automated Attestation

We need to make sure vendors are still necessary, on a basis. Business owners have to check that they still need access so we can stop people from getting access they do not need in systems that are not our own. This will help prevent identity creep in systems that are used by third party vendors.

Fourth-Party Risk Visibility

To comply with DORA's concentration risk obligations, it is necessary to monitor and trace sub-contractors. The new IGA solutions can now map out the entire Identity ecosystem of the supply chain and can ensure that the technicians of a Cloud provider or the Sub-contractors of a Vendor will not become an unmonitored backdoor into your environment.

Conclusion: From Regulatory Burden to Competitive Advantage

DORA compliance is something that you have to keep working on all the time. It is not something that you do one time. Then you are done. To do these financial institutions can make a plan to deal with problems. This plan can help them use automated Identity Governance and Administration or IGA for short in the ways:

  • Reduce the time it takes to fix identity problems from hours to just seconds

  • Stop doing compliance reports by hand and use computers to check everything all the time and collect proof

  • Make it faster to add vendors while still keeping everything safe

  • Change the way they get ready for audits from a big rush every quarter to a dashboard that shows if they are complying with the rules in real time

If organizations think that DORA compliance is just something they have to do to follow the rules, they will have a hard time meeting the deadline in January 2026. If they use IGA to help them deal with problems, they will be able to move faster and be more trusted by the people they work with. DORA compliance will help these organizations be better, than their competitors. DORA is important. Organizations need to take DORA compliance seriously.


Stay tuned to our blog to see more posts about

Sailpoint products implementation and its related updates.

Stay tuned to our blog to see more posts about SailPoint products implementation and its related updates.

Category:

Category:

Security

Security

Introduction

The Digital Operational Resilience Act or DORA will be fully adopted by all EU countries and their major trading partners in 2026.It will change how financial stability is achieved in the European Union and global markets. DORA is different, from regulations that mainly focused on data protection. This new regulation requires institutions to show that their technology systems can handle, respond to and recover from all kinds of disruptions. These disruptions can range from cyberattacks to system failures. Because of this change Identity Governance and Administration or IGA becomes a part of a financial institution’s infrastructure. IGA provides automated controls that help institutions withstand disruptions. It also helps them keep monitoring their compliance, DORA and IGA are important for financial institutions to manage risks and stay compliant.

The Shift from Compliance to Resilience

Under DORA Article 8 financial institutions have to show that their computer systems can deal with problems respond to them and get back to normal after something goes wrong. Now people who work on IGA projects focus on two things that help financial institutions be strong:

1. Critical Function Mapping with Risk-Based Access Controls

DORA Article 9 says that institutions have to find out which parts of their business are crucial to keeping things running. IGA platforms help with this by doing a thing:

Identity-to-Function Mapping

They automatically label accounts that have access to important systems. Like the systems that handle payments, trading and the main banking systems. This helps people see which users can affect how well the business runs.

Graduated Security Controls

They use special controls for users who have a lot of power while still following the idea that no one should be trusted completely. Users who have a lot of power get attention and only get access to what they need at the last minute.

Continuous Verification

They get rid of rules for who can access what and instead use rules that change based on how much of a risk something is. Access, to systems is always being checked to make sure it is okay based on what the user is doing the device they are using and what threats are out there. Which is what DORA says institutions should do to manage risk with their computer systems.

2. Incident Response Integration and Automated Containment

Automated Access Revocation

If someone’s identity is compromised the IGA platform can stop all access to cloud and, on-premise applications in a few seconds. Not hours. This automatic containment helps limit the damage and keeps things running smoothly.

Identity-Centric Threat Detection

The IGA platform works with Security Information and Event Management tools to look at what people doing with their identities and see if there are any security problems. If someone is accessing things in a way the system takes action right away.

Immutable Audit Trails

The IGA platform is really useful because it keeps a record of every time someone tries to access something. This is helpful, for incident reports that DORA needs. When something goes wrong the people who make the rules can look at the IGA platform to see what happened and how it was handled. The IGA platform gives them the information they need to do their job.

Governing ICT Third-Party Risk Under DORA

Article 28 of DORA sets rules, for checking on third-party service providers. These providers include cloud providers, fintech partners and consulting firms.

Vendor Access Lifecycle Management

Modern IGA platforms manage extended enterprise risk through:

Time-Bound Provisioning

Automatically give vendors access, with expiration dates that match their contract terms. When a consulting project ends or a cloud service contract runs out access is taken away automatically. This way you do not have to worry about accounts anymore.

Security Threshold Monitoring

We need to check how safe the vendors are. If a vendor does not do well on the security tests or does not follow the rules, we agreed on the IGA platforms will stop them from getting in until they fix the problems with their security. We have to keep checking the security of the vendors all the time.

Automated Attestation

We need to make sure vendors are still necessary, on a basis. Business owners have to check that they still need access so we can stop people from getting access they do not need in systems that are not our own. This will help prevent identity creep in systems that are used by third party vendors.

Fourth-Party Risk Visibility

To comply with DORA's concentration risk obligations, it is necessary to monitor and trace sub-contractors. The new IGA solutions can now map out the entire Identity ecosystem of the supply chain and can ensure that the technicians of a Cloud provider or the Sub-contractors of a Vendor will not become an unmonitored backdoor into your environment.

Conclusion: From Regulatory Burden to Competitive Advantage

DORA compliance is something that you have to keep working on all the time. It is not something that you do one time. Then you are done. To do these financial institutions can make a plan to deal with problems. This plan can help them use automated Identity Governance and Administration or IGA for short in the ways:

  • Reduce the time it takes to fix identity problems from hours to just seconds

  • Stop doing compliance reports by hand and use computers to check everything all the time and collect proof

  • Make it faster to add vendors while still keeping everything safe

  • Change the way they get ready for audits from a big rush every quarter to a dashboard that shows if they are complying with the rules in real time

If organizations think that DORA compliance is just something they have to do to follow the rules, they will have a hard time meeting the deadline in January 2026. If they use IGA to help them deal with problems, they will be able to move faster and be more trusted by the people they work with. DORA compliance will help these organizations be better, than their competitors. DORA is important. Organizations need to take DORA compliance seriously.


Stay tuned to our blog to see more posts about

Sailpoint products implementation and its related updates.

Category:

Security